An Technology blog focusing on portable devices. I have a news Blog @ News . I have a Culture, Politic and Religion Blog @ Opinionand my domain is @ Armwood.Com. I have a Jazz Blog @ Jazz. I have a Human Rights Blog @ Law.
Saturday, September 19, 2015
NASA Video Reveals How 35 Years of Trash Turned Into Ocean Garbage Patches | TakePart
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is the most well known, but there are five gigantic clumps of trash in the world’s oceans. Now, a visualization by NASA shows how all the litter people around world carelessly toss onto streets and sidewalks travels on ocean currents and settles into those five gross globs of drifting detritus. The journey a single-use plastic bottle of water takes as it floats on the waves can’t be tracked with a satellite, so NASA visualized how discarded rubbish moves with the next best thing: buoys.
NASA Video Reveals How 35 Years of Trash Turned Into Ocean Garbage Patches | TakePart
Big Tech Has Become Way Too Powerful - The New York Times
Big Tech Has Become Way Too Powerful
By Robert B. Reich, www.nytimes.com September 18th, 2015
Despite an explosion in the number of websites over the last decade, page views are becoming more concentrated. While in 2001, the top 10 websites accounted for 31 percent of all page views in America, by 2010 the top 10 accounted for 75 percent. Google and Facebook are now the first stops for many Americans seeking news — while Internet traffic to much of the nation’s newspapers, network television and other news gathering agencies has fallen well below 50 percent of all traffic. Meanwhile, Amazon is now the first stop for almost a third of all American consumers seeking to buy anything. Talk about power.
Big Tech Has Become Way Too Powerful - The New York Times
By Robert B. Reich, www.nytimes.com September 18th, 2015
Despite an explosion in the number of websites over the last decade, page views are becoming more concentrated. While in 2001, the top 10 websites accounted for 31 percent of all page views in America, by 2010 the top 10 accounted for 75 percent. Google and Facebook are now the first stops for many Americans seeking news — while Internet traffic to much of the nation’s newspapers, network television and other news gathering agencies has fallen well below 50 percent of all traffic. Meanwhile, Amazon is now the first stop for almost a third of all American consumers seeking to buy anything. Talk about power.
Big Tech Has Become Way Too Powerful - The New York Times
Apple MacBook vs. Chromebook Pixel: USB-C Laptops Compared | News & Opinion | PCMag.com
- BY BRIAN WESTOVER
- APRIL 10, 2015 12:01AM EST
The new MacBook shares more than a passing resemblance to the latest Chromebook Pixel, but how do they compare?
There are some notable similarities between the two new systems, so the inevitable question becomes, how do they compare to one another?When the first Google Chromebook Pixel was introduced in 2013, it left a lot of folks confused. Some were off-put by the lack of local storage or traditional software support, while others were just befuddled as to where the pricey Pixel fit in a family of budget Chromebooks defined by sub-$400 prices. Prepare for some deja vu, because people may have warmed up to Chromebooks in the last two years, but the Pixel is back, with a base price of $999.
Name | Apple MacBook 12-Inch (2015) | Google Chromebook Pixel (2015) |
Lowest Price | $1,234.00Amazon | $1,259.01Amazon |
Editor Rating | ||
Processor Name | Intel Core M-5Y31 | Intel Core i5-5200U |
Processor Speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Operating System | Mac OS X | Google Chrome OS |
RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Storage Capacity (as Tested) | 256 GB | 32 GB |
Graphics Card | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
Screen Size | 12 inches | 12.85 inches |
Native Resolution | 2304 x 1440 | 2560 x 1700 |
Storage Type | SSD | SSD |
Weight | 1.98 lb | 3.3 lb |
Read the Review | Read the Review |
The overall design looks much like the previous model, a milled aluminum chassis that takes some minimalist cues from Apple designs, but ditches the tapered look for a more slab-like profile. A piano hinge running along the back edge provides smooth opening and stability against taps and swipes on the display, while a glowing stripe on the lid lights up in Google's rainbow of colors.
The new design measures 0.6 by 11.7 by 8.8 inches (HWD) and weighs 3.3 pounds. Compared to the new lighter-than-Air 12-inch Apple MacBook, that's a lot of weight and bulk. The new MacBook weighs just 2 pounds and measures 0.51 inches thick at the bulkiest point. It also looks a little boring, available only in a bare-metal grey, while the MacBook can be had in silver, space gray, or gold. On the design front, the point goes to Apple.
The Pixel's new display is apparently the same as the past model. Its 12.85-inch display takes on an unusual 3:2 aspect ratio, and offers multi-touch capability and 2,560-by-1,700-pixel resolution. That's a marginally larger screen than the new MacBook's 12-inch Retina display (2,304 by 1,440). The biggest difference here, however, is touch. Apple has made no moves to bring touch over to OS X from its iOS devices, so there's no touch screen on the new MacBook. If you've been using a Windows 8 laptop or tablet, or have simply become enamored with touch from using your smartphone or tablet, the Pixel has it and the MacBook doesn't.
The Chromebook Pixel is outfitted with a 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U processor, which easily outpaces the MacBook's 1.1GHz Intel Core M-5Y31 in terms of pure performance capability—in tests like Cinebench and Photoshop, the MacBook lags behind most competitors. But despite the disparity in hardware, it's not so cut and dried when comparing the Pixel to the MacBook, as the two systems apply that processing power in very different ways.
The Chrome OS paradigm shifts a lot of the processing load off of the device and onto the cloud, which is what allows inexpensive Chromebooks—which are frequently equipped with Intel Celeron and ARM processors—to offer decent performance despite the silicone inside. We have seen Chromebooks with Core i3 processors, like the Acer C720 Chromebook (C720-3404)$344.99 at Amazon and the Dell Chromebook 11 (Intel Core i3)$269.00 at Dell, but the difference in performance was minimal. It was most apparent in multitasking and video conferencing, but not regular Web browsing and app use.
There's also the question of storage. Apple's 12-inch MacBook has a 256GB solid-state drive, which isn't half bad, capacity-wise. The new Pixel offers 32GB of onboard storage, and even that's a step up from the 16GB that is the norm for Chromebooks. Google gets away with this by, again, shifting things off of the device. All of your documents, photos, videos, and the like are stored in Google Drive, so that local storage isn't anywhere near the hindrance it might first appear to be. That said, if you're usually working offline, or don't want to rely on cloud storage, the MacBook wins with its larger drive.
But for the cloud-friendly, Google is throwing in some pretty hefty extras, namely a full 1TB of Google Drive storage free for 3 years. That's a heck of a lot more than the free 100GB normally included with inexpensive Chromebooks, and it significantly changes the value equation for the Pixel. Currently, Google is offering 1TB of cloud storage for $10 per month, which would run you nearly $360 over three years. If you were thinking of upgrading your G-Drive storage anyway, this effectively drops the price of the Pixel down to a much more reasonable $640.
The other big point of divergence between the two is more physical: port selection. The Apple MacBook is stunning for its extremely narrow selection of ports, outfitted with nothing but a headset jack and a single USB-C connector that serves as charging port, video output, and data transfer. It's one of the first devices with USB-C to hit the market, meaning that MacBook users will need to either upgrade to USB-C-equipped peripherals or purchase several adapter dongles to get things like standard USB or HDMI functionality.
Google's Chromebook Pixel also offers USB-C, but with two main distinctions. First, it offers not one, but two USB-C ports, and either one can be used for power, leaving the other free for connecting another device, like a monitor. But second, unlike Apple, which stripped the MacBook of other ports, the Pixel is still outfitted with two USB 3.0 ports and an SD card reader. That's a huge benefit to anyone using a USB flash drive or a camera with an SD card, as it means that the Pixel will let you use the devices you already own, and won't force you to buy an extra adapter. (For more on that, check out What Is USB-C? An Explainer.)
Both the MacBook and the Pixel boast long battery life, but here we have a clear winner. The Pixel lasted an impressive 12 hours in our battery rundown test, but the MacBook lasted even longer, impressively stretching the battery life to 14 hours 10 minutes. If pure battery endurance is a priority, the MacBook wins, but either system will still carry you through a full day of work or school with hours to spare.
Last but not least, there's the price. The new Chromebook Pixel starts at $999. Now that might be a lot for a Chromebook, but it's a lot more affordable than the 2013 model. It's also more affordable than the Apple MacBook 12-inch, which starts at $1,299. Adjust those prices to account for the free cloud storage and the difference in necessary accessories, and the MacBook winds up costing roughly twice as much as the Pixel. If price is a big factor in your decision, the new Pixel is the better choice.
But ultimately, comparing MacBooks to Chromebooks is like comparing apples to oranges—they aren't two of the same thing. The two systems take an entirely different approach to both the user experience and what constitutes a PC. There are definitely some key advantages to the Pixel, like a touch screen, wider selection of ports, and free storage, but the Chrome OS isn't for everyone. In the end, neither is a must-buy, but both will surely have an influence that's felt throughout the laptop market in the next year or two as these new features and concepts filter down to more mainstream laptops.
Apple MacBook vs. Chromebook Pixel: USB-C Laptops Compared | News & Opinion | PCMag.com
Friday, September 18, 2015
Apple's iPad Mini 3 vs. iPad Mini 4: Should You Upgrade? | Digital Trends
"Ahhh, now we come down to it. What is the price difference between these two dueling pads? Well, there isn’t one. Your wallet will feel the same either way. Both options start at $399 for the basic version with 16GB of storage and Wi-Fi only. Storage jumps up in increments to 64GB and 128GB for both models, and the price eventually makes its way all the way to $729 , which includes 128GB and cellular data. Even the color options are the same.
Since the pricing is identical, if this is your first iPad Mini and you have your heart set on it, then there’s no reason not get the Mini 4. But if you are thinking about upgrading, or choosing between the Mini and another type of iPad model,it may not be worthwhile. The new model’s main improvement is the A8 processor, which is quicker than the old A7, but the Mini 3 is quick enough to last a couple more years."
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook
Apple's iPad Mini 3 vs. iPad Mini 4: Should You Upgrade? | Digital Trends
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Wednesday, September 16, 2015
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Apple iPad Pro vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 3: Computing hybrids face off | ExtremeTech
Hybrids are the front lines of the battle for user mind share
When Apple introduced the iPhone, it appealed to both Mac and Windows users. The result is that tens of millions of people use Windows on their desktop and iOS for their mobile devices. Similarly Android is used on mobile devices by a large number of Windows users. As a relatively new market, hybrids represent unclaimed territory that lies between Windows’ desktop dominance and a mobile space largely split between iOS and Android.
Now that Apple has a product in the hybrid space, I doubt many Mac users will bother looking anywhere else. The same can’t be said for Windows users — since many of them already have an iPhone or iPad they might decide that an upscale tablet like the iPad Pro is the right solution for them, instead of a downsized Windows computer like the Microsoft Surface. As an increasing amount of our computing is done on lightweight, mobile devices, that wouldn’t be good news for either Microsoft or Intel.
Apple iPad Pro vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 3: Computing hybrids face off | ExtremeTech
Monday, September 14, 2015
Sunday, September 13, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)