Moto G5 and G5 Plus hands-on: the BEST VALUE for money smartphones

Moto G5 Plus In-depth Review with Pros & Cons Camera Smartphone?

Moto G5 Plus Camera Review Compared with Moto G4 Plus & Redmi Note 4

15" Samsung Notebook 9 (2017) Review

Buy NOW? Or Wait for Surface Pro 5?? - Surface Pro 4 Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 review: Android's best foe to the iPad Pro - The Verge

"I'm in productivity hell. For the past week, I’ve been using Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S3 to read Twitter, correspond on Slack, and write articles for this website. The Tab S3 is capable of doing all these things — in some cases, it’s even capable of doing them quite well — but it’s not capable of doing them anywhere near as well as a proper laptop. And in the week I’ve had it, I’ve spent a lot of time wondering why I’d use this tablet as a portable work device instead of a cheaper, more functional computer like a Chromebook.



The Tab S3 is a direct shot from Samsung at Apple’s latest iPad Pro. On description alone, the two match up beat for beat: they have 9.7-inch, high-resolution displays (both 2048 x 1536), nearly top-of-the-line processors, 32GB of internal storage, fingerprint sensors, four speakers, measure 0.24 inches deep at their thickest, weigh just shy of one pound, sell for $599, and support both a stylus and keyboard case.



That means that, like the iPad Pro, the Tab S3 is pitched as more than just a tablet. It’s good for laying in bed and watching Netflix, of course, but it’s also supposed to be great for bringing to the coffee shop, propping up on a tray table, or firing off a quick email while you’re on the go. That’s a much more challenging task. And it’s one that, combined with the full $730 asking price for this tablet and its keyboard case (sold separately), Samsung has a fairly challenging bar to meet."



Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 review: Android's best foe to the iPad Pro - The Verge

Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 review | Ars Technica

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 | Review

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3

Companies Pull Ads From Google, YouTube Over Racist, Terrorist Content - NBC News. Facebook is probably the worst offender. It consistently allows racist content on it's site and ignores complaints.

Facebook is probably the worst offender.  It consistently allows racist content on it's site and ignores complaints.



"Major European clients are pulling their ad dollars out of Google and YouTube because of fears that their ads will end up next to videos promoting terrorism, racism and hate, and earn money for the extremists who posted the content.



Three of Britain’s biggest banks just removed their ads from Google when they saw their campaigns appearing next to extremist content.



According to Adweek and the Guardian, ad agency giant Havas Worldwide has also yanked all its ad money out of Google and YouTube in Britain, after Havas and Google couldn’t agree on how to keep the ads of French firm’s clients away from videos of terrorists and white supremacists.



McDonald’s, Audi, and the U.K. government have already stopped using the platforms in the U.K., amid concerns that extremist groups will earn money from their advertising. When an ad appears alongside a YouTube video, the individual or organization that posted video earns a small amount of money per viewing of the video."



Companies Pull Ads From Google, YouTube Over Racist, Terrorist Content - NBC News

Windows Central Podcast 41: What OS should the Surface Phone run?

Chuwi Lapbook 14.1 Review - Best Budget Laptop Yet?

why I RETURNED my NEW MACBOOK PRO What's wrong with APPLE